New York State Private Investigator Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the New York State Private Investigator Exam with comprehensive study resources featuring quizzes and informative content tailored to the exam syllabus. Enhance your knowledge and boost your confidence before the test!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the primary role of corroborating evidence in a legal case?

  1. To introduce new facts to the case

  2. To reinforce or support existing evidence

  3. To contradict witness testimonies

  4. To provide personal opinions about the case

The correct answer is: To reinforce or support existing evidence

The primary role of corroborating evidence in a legal case is to reinforce or support existing evidence. Corroborating evidence serves to bolster the credibility of the primary evidence presented, making it more persuasive and reliable. This type of evidence helps to confirm that the facts presented are accurate, consistent, and help substantiate the overall argument or claim being made in the case. For example, if a witness testifies about seeing an event occur, corroborating evidence might include surveillance footage or another witness who observed the same event. This additional support increases confidence in the validity of the witness's account, thereby strengthening the overall case. Introducing new facts would not align with the purpose of corroborating evidence, as it focuses on reinforcing what is already established rather than bringing in new information. Similarly, the roles of contradicting testimonies or providing personal opinions do not serve to uphold the integrity of existing evidence, which is the crucial function of corroborating evidence in the legal context.